Fairness as the key to Right of Equality was covered in a
former post.
Here, I discuss equality and capitalism.
It is inevitable that
there will always be rich and poor in a capitalist system,
and of course, money does
not solve all problems for anyone.
But capitalism
can work without such a
huge divide, of rich and poor,
in which mental and physical separation create such a divisive
form of suffering.
The balance is tilted.
When too much money flows into the hands of a few,
and too little money flows into the hands of many,
you have a broken society.
One potential, partial solution (not the ultimate only solution) to relieve extremes is through the way the money moves. Money needs to flow like water in a circle rather than a one-way upward rocket to outer space. Money has to come back down. But now, it flows in a line upward, dividing us and creating the broken, unbalanced society
of 1% wealthy and 99% other.
What if social giving for the wealthy was, instead of a random choice,
an obligation of having money?
What if social responsibility became a social
norm for all wealthy persons,
reducing the current levels of greed and arrogance by
replacing them with embracing life, love, and compassion?
That is, if a person receives money wealth, couldn't
they assume social responsibility as a part of owning that money?
The result moves us closer to a global community of harmony and balance.
Some wealthy do this, and they are community heroes.
Too many do not.
Funneling wealth money downward is not a norm, at present.
But couldn't "trickle-down economics" become "flow-down economics,"
where more wealthy take on larger, more significant actions that also create jobs?
Instead of another home, the rich person builds a better school.
Instead of a larger yacht, the rich person builds a free hospital.
Instead of another Rolex watch, the rich person buys acres of land
and then gifts it to Nature Conservancy to protect biodiversity.
These actions provide
freedoms and rights to others, such as the Right to Learn,
the Right to Body Care, and the Right to Biodiversity.
Another blog
Be the Change posted an article on 1/12/12 titled
"This Suit Isn't Going To Be Here When You Die"
and wrote:
"..."I'd love to see more wealthy people doing their part. Too many of them love running around the globe and spending $10,000 on a suit. Why not save children's lives and better the world? That suit isn't going to be here when you die, but the next generation will."...Think about that the next time you make a big purchase, and ask yourself what you're going to do to balance it out."
Read this great post.
Just as corporations are increasingly doing
CSR-- corporate social responsibility--as a social norm,
I would like to coin a new term: ISR--individual social responsibility--
could this become the new social norm?
Maybe, each wealthy person would have his own "ISR consultant."
These actions/projects would also help employ our huge, untapped resource: millions of college-educated individuals, living at the lower income levels.
Wealthy children could be groomed with the knowledge that they, too, have this obligation, if huge money becomes theirs. And, all wealthy people, at the end of their lives, could proudly list the social actions they had accomplished. Instead of the broken system of today, there may be an increase of harmony through compassion, with reduced anger and violence. These actions add to the army of individual volunteers already involved in community service and to an increased understanding that more knowledge and opportunities for all help level the extremes.
Of course, true equality can never really be attained in this system, but couldn't its extremes be lessened?
Inequality has its function in society, as commenter AG states: "If we are all equal in this world, then where will the spark that lights the fire come from?"
(Post-note: At present, ISR also stands for:
Intellegience, Surveillance, and Reconnaisance,
a government military term!)
Revision thanks to: BRM, YEM, AG, Fidela, RCW